Evidence mapPaperPMID 42406404Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2026

At-Home Transvaginal Pelvic Ultrasonography and Image Quality in Premenopausal Women: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.

Alessandra J Ainsworth, Caitlin Sacha, Stylianos Vagios, Ben Doke, Wendy Vitek, Dmitry Fridman, Tina Islam, Jillian Pecoriello, Jerome Chelliah, Annie Martini and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05443698 (Sonograms Enable Looking Forward- Get Your iNformation 1 Trial), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05443698 nacompletednot on this map

Sonograms Enable Looking Forward- Get Your iNformation 1 Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorTurtle Health, Inc.Ran2022 to 2023Enrolled365ConditionsFertility RiskArmsTransvaginal ultrasound
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Alessandra J AinsworthDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Caitlin SachaDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center, Worcester.
Stylianos VagiosDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Ben DokeMidland Women's Clinic, Midland, Texas.
Wendy VitekDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
Dmitry FridmanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York.
Tina IslamDepartment of Radiology, MetroWest Medical Center, Framingham, Massachusetts.
Jillian PecorielloDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York University Langone Medical Center.
Jerome ChelliahDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mercy Health, Cleveland, Ohio.
Annie MartiniFertility Centers of Illinois, Glenview.
Lauren VerrilliDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Michelle BrownDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Aaron StyerCCRM Fertility Boston, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Transvaginal pelvic imaging is an integral and sensitive aspect of gynecologic care that individuals find both invasive and burdensome. At-home transvaginal imaging provides an opportunity to navigate these barriers to care. Objective: To evaluate the use of at-home transvaginal ultrasonography for gynecologic assessment, as measured by diagnostic imaging quality and participant satisfaction, in a broad sampling of women aged 22 to 50 years. Design, Setting, and Participants: Prospective, interventional, single group nonrandomized clinical trial with blinded review of collected images from premenopausal women aged 22 to 50 from Florida, Massachusetts, Maryland, Maine, Minnesota, New Hampshire, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Vermont, and Washington, DC. Images were gathered between July 2022 and July 2023, and data were analyzed from April to September 2025. Intervention: At-home pelvic ultrasonography guided by verbal communication with a fully trained remote sonographer who had real-time access to study images. Cine clips were used to capture standard views of the uterus, ovaries, cervix, and posterior cul-de-sac. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were image quality and participant net promoter score (NPS), reflecting participants' likelihood of recommending the procedure, with higher scores indicating greater likelihood. Secondary outcomes included minor pain or discomfort, sonographer reported experience and/or pain, and all other adverse events. Results: A total of 265 participants (mean [SD] age, 32 [6.7] years; mean [SD] body mass index, 27.0 [5.6]) enrolled in the trial, and 263 ultrasonographic scans were completed. Image quality showed that 253 at-home ultrasonographic scans (96.2%) met diagnostic quality while 10 (3.8%) did not. NPS was significantly higher with use of the at-home ultrasonography (59) compared with in-clinic scans (24), with an adjusted difference of 33.7 (95% CI, 23.3-44.0; z = 6.35; P < .001). No adverse events were reported. Conclusions and Relevance: This nonrandomized clinical trial of at-home pelvic ultrasonography in premenopausal women demonstrated that broad use of at-home gynecologic ultrasonography technology is feasible, safe, and preferred by participants and sonographers compared with in-clinic ultrasonography. At-home ultrasonographic imaging presented an innovative and clinically acceptable alternative to in-clinic care, providing opportunities for improved access to and decreased burden of gynecologic and reproductive care. Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05443698.

Indexed as

PelvisPremenopauseAdultFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionProspective StudiesUltrasonographyVaginaYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42406404
PMCPMC13338803

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.