ArticleNeurology2026
Association of Changes in Intrinsic Capacity With Cognitive Decline and Dementia: A Prospective Cohort Study.
Article in Neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesPrevious studies found that intrinsic capacity (IC) was an important risk factor for dementia. However, these studies focused on baseline IC, without considering the dynamic changes in IC. The study aimed to investigate the associations of changes in IC with cognitive decline and dementia and assess whether these associations varied by race.
methodsA cohort study was conducted using data from the Health and Retirement Study. An IC deficit score was calculated by 7 factors reflecting 4 domains. Changes in IC were assessed by comparing the baseline IC status with that observed in the second survey. Cognitive decline was evaluated by computing a standardized z-score based on memory, executive function, and orientation. Dementia was diagnosed either through self-reported physician diagnosis or an alternative approach based on cognitive score. Linear mixed effects models and Cox models were performed to analyze the association of changes in IC with cognitive decline and dementia.
resultsA total of 7,744 participants (male: 42.4%, mean age: 75.6 years) were included. The median follow-up period was 8.9 years. Compared with participants who maintained robust IC status, those whose IC status progressed to deficit status showed accelerated global cognitive decline (β, -0.025; 95% CI -0.036 to -0.015) and increased risk of dementia (hazard ratio [HR], 1.38; 95% CI 1.10-1.72). Conversely, participants who recovered from IC deficit to robust status showed decelerated global cognitive decline (β, 0.010; 95% CI 0.001 to 0.019) and decreased risk of dementia (HR, 0.84; 95% CI 0.72-0.98) relative to those with stable IC deficit. In addition, the associations of baseline IC with cognitive decline and dementia appeared to be somewhat stronger among Black participants, relative to White participants ( DISCUSSION: The findings indicated that the progression of IC deficit status was associated with accelerated cognitive decline and increased risk of dementia. Conversely, recovery of IC deficit status was associated with a decelerated cognitive decline and decreased risk of dementia. Future studies with more measurement waves are warranted to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.