Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42407055›Full record

ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2026

Real-World Mapping of Multiple Primary Carcinoma Combinations and Survival Outcomes in Shanghai, China: Retrospective Registry-Based Study.

Jianwei Shi, Yichen Chen, Chen Chen, Xiaopan Li, Hua Jin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jianwei Shi *School of Public Health, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3523-6246
Yichen Chen *Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9043-6961
Chen Chen *Shanghai Jing'an District Jiangning Road Community Health Service Centre, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0009-0008-9410-3313
Xiaopan LiDepartment of Health Management Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9625-478X
Hua JinDepartment of General Practice, Yangpu Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9735-0335

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultiple primary carcinomas (MPC) represent a clinically significant yet underexplored phenomenon, where patients develop more than one distinct primary malignancy. While prior studies have examined MPC within specific cancer types, comprehensive real-world patterns of primary malignancies and their subsequent primary malignancies remain limited. Moreover, the survival outcomes associated with these MPC patterns, particularly in relation to demographic and clinical characteristics, are not well characterized.

objectiveThis study aimed to establish the patterns and combinations of MPC across a wide range of cancers and to assess whether the mortality status of patients with MPCs varies according to their demographic characteristics and disease status.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of 1560 patients with MPC in Shanghai, China, from 2002 to 2015. Data were extracted from the Shanghai Cancer Registry, with follow-up until December 2017. Cause of death was ascertained through linkage with the Shanghai Vital Registration System. The distribution of the frequency and proportion of primary carcinoma (PC) combinations were depicted, and a life table was used to calculate the 1- to 5-year survival rates. Cox regression analysis was performed to analyze the survival risk factors of the first and second PCs.

resultsAmong the 1560 patients (809/1560, 51.86% male and 751/1560, 48.14% female), the most frequent first PCs were colorectal, breast, and stomach cancers, while the most frequent second PCs were lung, colorectal, and stomach cancers. The most common combinations included colorectal and lung, colorectal and stomach, and colorectal and prostate. Survival rates were lowest for first PCs of skin (5 years=46.95%) and lung (5 years=41.54%) cancers, and for second PCs of pancreatic (5 year=9.13%) and liver (5 years=14.19%) cancers. A latency period of 12 months between PC diagnoses was associated with significantly higher cancer-specific mortality for both the first primary cancer (hazard ratio [HR] 3.539, 95% CI 2.822-4.438; P<.001) and the second primary cancer (HR 1.369, 95% CI 1.103-1.699; P=.004). Older age (>65 years) and advanced tumor stage (III+IV) were also significant independent risk factors for poor survival in both first PC (age: HR 2.049, 95% CI 1.689-2.485; P<.001; stage: HR 1.496, 95% CI 1.315-1.703; P<.001) and second PC (age: HR 1.575, 95% CI 1.242-1.996; P<.001; stage: HR 3.933, 95% CI 3.182-4.861; P<.001) analyses.

conclusionsThis study provides a comprehensive, real-world map of MPC patterns and highlights important findings: high-risk cancer combinations and key factors associated with poorer survival, including a short interdiagnosis interval (12 months), advanced age, and advanced tumor stage. Comprehensive prevention and control strategies for MPC should be developed, and clinicians should be aware of the risks of MPC in vulnerable populations during the early diagnosis stage.

Indexed as

Neoplasms, Multiple PrimaryAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChinaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRegistriesRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSurvival AnalysisSurvival Ratemultiple primary carcinomareal-world mapsrisksitesurvival rate

Identifiers

PMID42407055
PMCPMC13386119

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.