ReviewNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2026
Contemporary surgical strategies for resection of intracranial gliomas.
Review in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diffuse gliomas are the most common primary brain tumors in adults. Maximal safe resection represents the recommended initial management step for affected patients, and accumulating evidence emphasizes the favorable effects of more extensive resection on survival. The oncological role of surgery seems to be most pronounced in tumors with an aggressive natural history, and the concept of supramaximal resection is currently emerging, particularly in IDH-wildtype glioblastoma and IDH-mutant astrocytoma. Interactive effects between more extensive resection and other clinical prognostic markers on outcome have recently been described, and a more profound understanding of these interactions can help in identifying patients most likely to benefit from aggressive surgery. Advanced pre-operative imaging, intraoperative diagnostics of the molecular tumor properties, fluorescence-guided approaches, and real-time feedback on the tumor cell content at the margins of the resection cavity allow neurosurgeons to tailor the extent of resection according to the presumed biological tumor boundaries. Advances in functional mapping techniques have been established to push the resection boundaries while avoiding jeopardizing outcome by preserving neurological functioning. In the current review, we discuss the evidence for resection across different glioma subtypes. We then outline contemporary resection strategies to achieve maximal resection, elaborate on technical adjuncts to minimize the risk of clinical deterioration even when resecting tumors located in eloquent brain areas, and finally elaborate on emerging intraoperative diagnostics, which may affect surgical strategies. As such, this review aims to provide neurosurgeons with the information needed to navigate judicious surgical decision-making in an era of precision neurosurgical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.