Evidence mapPaperPMID 42407228Full record

ReviewNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2026

Contemporary surgical strategies for resection of intracranial gliomas.

Jan Kueckelhaus, Sebastian Jeising, Jacob S Young, Arthur Wagner, Jasper K W Gerritsen, Chiara Negwer, Bernhard Meyer, Oliver Schnell, Jörg-Christian Tonn, Philipp Karschnia

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jan KueckelhausDepartment of Neurosurgery, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander Universität-Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Sebastian JeisingDepartment of Neurosurgery, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander Universität-Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Jacob S YoungDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
Arthur WagnerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Jasper K W GerritsenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Chiara NegwerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Bernhard MeyerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Oliver SchnellDepartment of Neurosurgery, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander Universität-Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Jörg-Christian TonnDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
Philipp KarschniaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander Universität-Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany; Department of Neurosurgery, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. Electronic address: p.karschnia@neuroonc.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diffuse gliomas are the most common primary brain tumors in adults. Maximal safe resection represents the recommended initial management step for affected patients, and accumulating evidence emphasizes the favorable effects of more extensive resection on survival. The oncological role of surgery seems to be most pronounced in tumors with an aggressive natural history, and the concept of supramaximal resection is currently emerging, particularly in IDH-wildtype glioblastoma and IDH-mutant astrocytoma. Interactive effects between more extensive resection and other clinical prognostic markers on outcome have recently been described, and a more profound understanding of these interactions can help in identifying patients most likely to benefit from aggressive surgery. Advanced pre-operative imaging, intraoperative diagnostics of the molecular tumor properties, fluorescence-guided approaches, and real-time feedback on the tumor cell content at the margins of the resection cavity allow neurosurgeons to tailor the extent of resection according to the presumed biological tumor boundaries. Advances in functional mapping techniques have been established to push the resection boundaries while avoiding jeopardizing outcome by preserving neurological functioning. In the current review, we discuss the evidence for resection across different glioma subtypes. We then outline contemporary resection strategies to achieve maximal resection, elaborate on technical adjuncts to minimize the risk of clinical deterioration even when resecting tumors located in eloquent brain areas, and finally elaborate on emerging intraoperative diagnostics, which may affect surgical strategies. As such, this review aims to provide neurosurgeons with the information needed to navigate judicious surgical decision-making in an era of precision neurosurgical care.

Indexed as

GliomaMaximal safe resectionOperationSupramaximalSurgical adjuncts

Identifiers

PMID42407228
PMCPMC13355809

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.