ReviewJournal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society2026
Systems engineering of engineered live biotherapeutics: A discovery-to-translation framework for streamlining microbiome therapeutic development.
Review in Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Skin microbiome and cutaneous aging mechanisms and clinical implications.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the vast opportunities for therapeutic manipulation of the gut microbiome, recent late-stage clinical failures of engineered live biotherapeutic products (eLBPs) highlight critical knowledge gaps in ecological barriers and community dynamics. In this review, we propose repurposing the current eLBP toolkit as a set of discovery instruments that yield quantitative outputs for predictive modeling. We examine cutting-edge approaches in microbiome engineering and outline opportunities for their use in tandem with systems engineering methodology to conduct functional probing that establishes quantitative parameters describing community resilience, metabolic flux, and host-microbe interactions. Next, in light of FDA guidance on New Approach Methodologies, we detail how in silico and in vitro modeling approaches can be combined and leveraged not only for a priori triage of unviable designs, but can also be integrated into design-build-test-learn (DBTL) pipelines for functional forecasting. Building off an emerging cellular kinetics/pharmacodynamics (CK/PD) framework, we develop a Bayesian updating workflow that encapsulates eLBP-adapted equivalents of pharmacological parameters such as Cmax, Tmax, and AUC. Further, we adapt this framework for adaptive or prospective use, rather than purely retrospective application, supporting trial design rather than post-hoc analysis. This approach repositions eLBP development from an empirical, intuition-based process toward a predictive, model-informed pipeline that aligns with emerging regulatory frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.