Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42409848›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Large-scale discovery and annotation of substructure patterns in mass spectrometry profiles.

Laura Rosina Torres Ortega, Jonas Dietrich, Joe Wandy, Hans Mol, Justin J J van der Hooft

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Laura Rosina Torres Ortega *Bioinformatics Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands. rosina.torresortega@wur.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4439-6740
Jonas Dietrich *Bioinformatics Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands. jonas.dietrich@wur.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7913-2249
Joe WandyCollege of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3068-4664
Hans MolWageningen Food Safety Research - part of Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0087-6910
Justin J J van der HooftBioinformatics Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands. justin.vanderhooft@wur.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9340-5511

Funding

EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020) 101072485
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Untargeted mass spectrometry can detect thousands of molecules at once, potentially offering powerful insights into complex samples. However, the increasing scale of experimental datasets and spectral libraries limits our ability to extract and annotate structural information to allow for interpretation. Here, we present the software tool MS2LDA 2.0 that helps to address this gap by identifying recurring fragmentation patterns (Mass2Motifs) that can reflect shared chemical substructures. We introduce automated annotation support through Mass2Motif Annotation Guidance (MAG) that provides suggestions to interpret detected patterns. Our unsupervised pattern mining tool enables the study of much larger datasets with up to 14 times faster analysis than its predecessor. We demonstrate the utility of MS2LDA 2.0 and MAG in applications such as detecting pesticide-related substructures and exploring unknown fungal compounds. Together, these advances make it easier to uncover meaningful chemical patterns in complex data.

Indexed as

Mass SpectrometrySoftwareAlgorithmsData MiningPesticidesPesticides

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.