Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42410075›Full record

ReviewCommunications biology2026

Prospects of DNA nanotechnology in stroke repair and regeneration.

Krupa Kansara, Keya Jantrania, Shaivee Chokshi, Dhiraj Bhatia, Ashutosh Kumar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Communications biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Krupa KansaraDepartment of Biological Sciences and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar, Gandhinagar, India. krupa.k@iitgn.ac.in.ORCID 0000-0002-0079-327X
Keya Jantrania *Biological and Life Sciences Division, School of Arts and Sciences, Ahmedabad University, Ahmedabad, India.
Shaivee Chokshi *Biological and Life Sciences Division, School of Arts and Sciences, Ahmedabad University, Ahmedabad, India.
Dhiraj BhatiaDepartment of Biological Sciences and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar, Gandhinagar, India. dhiraj.bhatia@iitgn.ac.in.ORCID 0000-0002-1478-6417
Ashutosh KumarBiological and Life Sciences Division, School of Arts and Sciences, Ahmedabad University, Ahmedabad, India. ashutosh.kumar@ahduni.edu.in.ORCID 0000-0002-6856-3980

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stroke remains a significant global cause of death and long-term disability, with limited effective treatments for repairing and regenerating damaged brain tissue. Conventional therapy primarily focuses on acute care and preventing recurrence, but it falls short in restoring lost neural function. Recent advances in DNA nanotechnology, enabling precise molecular engineering, targeted delivery, and dynamic bio-functional platforms, offer promising avenues to address this gap. DNA nanostructures have been explored for various stroke therapies, including neuroprotective drug delivery, promoting angiogenesis, reducing inflammation, and guiding stem cells, thanks to their programmability, biocompatibility, and structural adaptability. Additionally, DNA nanodevices paired with imaging agents allow real-time monitoring of cerebral repair processes. Recent studies suggest that DNA nanoparticles could enhance neuronal survival, support functional regeneration, and modify the post-stroke environment. Despite these promising developments, significant challenges remain in vivo stability, immunogenicity, large-scale manufacturing, and safety for translation. This review outlines the current applications of DNA nanotechnology in stroke repair and regeneration, offering mechanistic insights into their therapeutic roles and prospects for clinical translation of DNA-based nanotherapeutics in neuroregenerative medicine.

Indexed as

DNANanotechnologyRegenerationStrokeAnimalsDNA NanostructuresDrug Delivery SystemsHumansNerve RegenerationDNA

Identifiers

PMID42410075
PMCPMC13338385

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.