ArticleJournal of cardiovascular translational research2026
Predicting Mortality After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in a Multiethnic Southeast Asian Population: Insights From Machine Learning.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular translational research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ischemic heart disease remains a major contributor to mortality in Malaysia, with non-elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) frequently performed in high-risk acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. Using nationwide registry data (2007-2020), we evaluated 29,521 patients and compared seven machine learning (ML) models for predicting in-hospital, 30-day, and 1-year mortality. Models were developed in a training cohort and externally validated using hospital-level (TEST1) and prospective temporal (TEST2) cohorts. After logistic recalibration, discrimination for in-hospital mortality ranged from 0.927 to 0.943 (TEST1) and 0.865-0.884 (TEST2). For 30-day mortality, ROC-AUC ranged from 0.902 to 0.923 (TEST1) and 0.753-0.838 (TEST2), and for 1-year mortality from 0.833 to 0.859 (TEST1) and 0.750-0.801 (TEST2). Calibration remained acceptable, and decision curve analysis demonstrated positive net benefit across clinically relevant thresholds. Cross-model stability analysis consistently identified age, haemodynamic status, and renal function as key predictors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.