ReviewBioFactors (Oxford, England)
Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster as Model Organisms in Biofactor Research.
Review in BioFactors (Oxford, England). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Model organisms play a central role in advancing our understanding of human nutrition and physiology. This narrative review highlights the unique advantages of the invertebrate models Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster for studying biofactors-diet-derived compounds that modulate biological functions. Both models offer powerful genetic toolkits, short life cycles, and cost-effective maintenance, enabling high-throughput and mechanistic investigations. Particular emphasis is placed on the availability of chemically defined diets, which allow precise manipulation of nutrient and biofactor composition. These features make C. elegans and D. melanogaster invaluable systems for dissecting the essentiality, bioavailability, and physiological impact of individual biofactors as illustrated by selected recent studies. Being ethically less problematic substitutes for mammalian models, both invertebrate models offer the possibility of closing the gap that often exists between in vitro and cell culture studies on the one hand and in vivo evaluation in animal experiments in laboratory rodents on the other. By integrating these model systems into experimental research, we can gain critical insights into biofactor-gene interactions and the molecular mechanisms underlying their health-promoting properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.