SynthesisDiabetes/metabolism research and reviews2026
Less Is More? Physical Inactivity and Increased Risk of Diabetes-Related Foot Ulceration-A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsThose at risk of diabetes-related foot ulceration (DFU) must balance sufficient physical activity to maintain glycaemic control and cardiovascular health whilst avoiding excessive trauma to their feet. Our systematic review aimed to assess whether physical inactivity and/or sedentary behaviour affect DFU outcomes. MATERIALS AND
methodsEmbase, Medline, and Scopus were searched for peer-reviewed studies using the criteria: ('diabetes' OR 'diabetic') AND ('physical*' OR 'activ*' OR 'inactiv*' OR 'sedentary') AND 'foot' AND 'ulcer', returning 4650 results excluding duplicates. 16 studies were included and assessed for risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).
resultsFifteen studies assessed physical inactivity and 1 assessed both inactivity and sedentary behaviour and DFU outcomes. Eleven of 16 (69%) studies reported significantly greater likelihood of DFU in inactive participants. Exploratory meta-analysis suggested physical inactivity to be associated with doubled DFU risk (OR 2.09, 95% CI 1.32-3.32, p = 0.002). Evidence that sedentary behaviour was associated with tripled DFU risk was based on a single prospective cohort and had a high risk of bias (OR 2.95, 95% CI: 1.5-6.4, p = 0.008; n = 175, NOS: poor). Study methodologies were heterogenous (e.g., inconsistent definitions of inactive), with habitual physical activity measured through interviews, patient records, or questionnaires in 14 of 16 studies (NOS rating: poor to fair).
conclusionsAvailable evidence suggested that physical inactivity and sedentary behaviour were associated with an increased risk of DFU. Further research is needed to develop thresholds for physical inactivity and sedentary behaviour to reduce DFU risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.