ArticleCirculation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology2026
Identifying the Presence and Characteristics of Mid-Myocardial and Epicardial Fibrosis From Intracardiac Electrograms in Patients Undergoing Ventricular Arrhythmia Ablation Using a Transformer-Based Self-Supervised Classifier.
Article in Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCatheter ablation is an essential tool for ventricular arrhythmia management, yet sustained procedural success is hindered by the limited ability to identify nonendocardial arrhythmogenic substrates during the procedure. Although delayed enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging is the reference standard for detecting myocardial fibrosis, barriers including cost, workflow complexity, and artifacts in patients with implantable devices limit its preprocedural use. We hypothesized that intracardiac electrograms provide sufficient information to infer scar beyond the endocardial surface and that this information can be harnessed by machine learning techniques.
methodsThis retrospective study included a total of 131 584 cardiac contact electrogram (EGM) signals collected from 46 patients undergoing ventricular arrhythmia ablation. A stratified patient-wise split was used to create the training/validation set (N=37) and the testing set (N=9), while ensuring a similar distribution of scar types. We developed a novel image-processing workflow to create scar labels using coregistered cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and electroanatomic mapping surface meshes. We developed a transformer-based self-supervised model, EGM2Scar-AI, alongside basic convolutional neural network models using either EGM waveforms or EGM-derived short-time Fourier transform spectrograms.
resultsThe average task-specific area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of both the basic and short-time Fourier transform-based convolutional neural networks was 0.729 (0.725-0.732) and 0.729 (0.726-0.733), respectively, while EGM2Scar-AI performed significantly better with an average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.822 (0.819-0.825) across all 3 scar types. All models performed better on endocardial and mid-myocardial fibrosis identification, with a modest reduction in performance for epicardial fibrosis. Sensitivity improved significantly with the transformer-based architecture without appreciable changes in specificity.
conclusionsOur study demonstrates that routine intracardiac electrograms enable the identification of endocardial, mid-myocardial, and epicardial scar using a transformer-based self-supervised deep learning model. Ultimately, our model has the potential to provide magnetic resonance imaging-like fibrosis maps during EP procedures without the need for external imaging and to increase the data set size for patient-specific models in ventricular arrhythmia research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.