Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42412290›Full record

ArticleThe Saudi dental journal2026

Impact of data augmentation and backbone architecture selection on dental caries segmentation in panoramic radiographs: a comparative deep learning study using pre-trained U-Net models.

Elaheh Asghari, Rabehe Ostadhassan, Alireza Asghari, Zahra Raeisi, Nasim Razavi, Hossein Najafzadeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Saudi dental journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elaheh AsghariPolytechnic University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Rabehe OstadhassanIslamic Azad University, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Alireza AsghariWichita State University, Wichita, USA.
Zahra RaeisiFairleigh Dickinson University, Vancouver, Canada.
Nasim RazaviNorth Khorasan University of Medical Sciences, Bojnourd, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Hossein NajafzadehTabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Islamic Republic of Iran. hossein.najafzadeh.170471@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7411-8480

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluates the impact of data augmentation and preprocessing on U-Net model performance for dental caries segmentation in panoramic X-ray images, comparing different pre-trained backbone architectures. A combined dataset of 500 panoramic dental X-ray images was analyzed: 400 from Tabriz University of Medical Sciences (1024 × 2048 pixels) and 100 publicly available images (1536 × 768 pixels), all with manually annotated, expert-validated segmentation masks. A preprocessing pipeline including resizing, bilateral filtering, CLAHE contrast enhancement, unsharp masking, and normalization was applied, and data augmentation (rotation, shifting, shearing, zooming, horizontal flipping) expanded the dataset to 1,000 images. Four U-Net architectures (standard, VGG16, ResNet50, and Xception) were evaluated across four scenarios (with/without augmentation and preprocessing), using Dice coefficient, IoU, accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and AUC-ROC through five-fold cross-validation. The Xception-based U-Net, with both augmentation and preprocessing, achieved the highest performance (Dice: 0.9517 ± 0.0029, IoU: 0.9079 ± 0.0053), while the standard U-Net achieved Dice: 0.7380 ± 0.2099 and IoU: 0.6203 ± 0.2193 under the same configuration. Models lacking augmentation or preprocessing performed substantially worse, with ResNet50 without augmentation showing severe degradation (Dice: 0.0068 ± 0.0002). The combined configuration also yielded the lowest validation loss (0.0154) and improved stability across folds. This study demonstrates that combining pre-trained backbones, data augmentation, and systematic preprocessing significantly enhances dental caries segmentation accuracy, with the Xception-based model achieving near-optimal results while models without augmentation failed dramatically. These findings highlight the essential role of comprehensive data preparation and provide a foundation for robust computer-aided diagnostic systems, potentially enabling automated caries detection and improved clinical decision-making in dental radiography.

Indexed as

Deep learningDental cariesImage segmentationPanoramic X-rayResNet50U-NetVGG16Xception

Identifiers

PMID42412290
PMCPMC13341999

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.