ArticleOdontology2026
Mitochondrial dysfunction in peri-implantitis: bioinformatics and machine learning analysis with in vivo experiment.
Article in Odontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to identify mitochondria-related hub genes in peri-implantitis and to detect their expression in a Sprague-Dawley (SD) rat model. Human peri-implantitis tissue datasets (GSE223924, GSE33774, and GSE106090) were obtained from the GEO database and cross-referenced with the MitoCarta3.0 database to identify mitochondria-related differentially expressed genes (MitoDEGs). Functional characterization was performed through protein-protein interaction (PPI) network analysis, Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment, and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analyses. Hub genes were further selected using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and the Boruta algorithm. Their discriminative capacity was assessed via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Finally, a peri-implantitis model was established in SD rats, and hub gene expression was detected by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). A total of 115 MitoDEGs were identified, among which 80 genes formed the core interaction network. Machine learning methods identified five hub genes (TSPO, THEM5, SARDH, COX4I2, and ACSM1), all of which exhibited favorable discriminative ability in both the training and testing sets. Animal experiments confirmed that, compared with the healthy group, the expression patterns of the hub genes in peri-implantitis tissues were consistent with the bioinformatics results. This study offers novel insights into the molecular mechanisms of peri-implantitis and presents potential targets for therapeutic intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42412387What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.