Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42412809›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026

Benchmarking AI scientists for omics data-driven biological discovery.

Erpai Luo, Jinmeng Jia, Yifan Xiong, Xiangyu Li, Xiaobo Guo, Baoqi Yu, Minsheng Hao, Lei Wei, Xuegong Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Systematic Mining of Bioactive Compounds for Wound Healing FromJMIR bioinformatics and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Erpai LuoMOE Key Laboratory of Bioinformatics and Bioinformatics Division of BNRIST, Department of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.ORCID 0009-0009-4087-6027
Jinmeng JiaMOE Key Laboratory of Bioinformatics and Bioinformatics Division of BNRIST, Department of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
Yifan XiongMOE Key Laboratory of Bioinformatics and Bioinformatics Division of BNRIST, Department of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
Xiangyu LiSchool of Software Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, 100044, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6017-0701
Xiaobo GuoDepartment of Physiology and Pathophysiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100069, China.
Baoqi YuDepartment of Physiology and Pathophysiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100069, China.
Minsheng HaoMOE Key Laboratory of Bioinformatics and Bioinformatics Division of BNRIST, Department of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
Lei WeiMOE Key Laboratory of Bioinformatics and Bioinformatics Division of BNRIST, Department of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
Xuegong ZhangMOE Key Laboratory of Bioinformatics and Bioinformatics Division of BNRIST, Department of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9684-5643

Funding

National Key R&D Program of China 2025YFC3409300National Natural Science Foundation of China 92470105Tsinghua-Toyota Joint Research Institute Inter-disciplinary Program 20243930093
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationRecent advances in large language models have enabled the emergence of AI scientists that aim to autonomously analyze biological data and assist scientific discovery. Despite rapid progress, it remains unclear to what extent these systems can extract meaningful biological insights from real experimental data. Existing benchmarks either evaluate reasoning in the absence of data or focus on predefined analytical outputs, failing to reflect realistic, data-driven biological research.

resultsHere, we introduce BAISBench (Biological AI Scientist Benchmark), a benchmark for evaluating AI scientists on real single-cell transcriptomic datasets. BAISBench comprises two tasks: cell type annotation across 15 expert-labeled datasets, and scientific discovery through 193 multiple-choice questions derived from biological conclusions reported in 41 published single-cell studies. We evaluated several representative AI scientists using BAISBench and, to provide a human performance baseline, invited five graduate-level bioinformaticians to collectively complete the same tasks. The results show that while current AI scientists fall short of fully autonomous biological discovery, they already demonstrate substantial potential in supporting data-driven biological research. These results position BAISBench as a practical benchmark for characterizing the current capabilities and limitations of AI scientists in biological research. We expect BAISBench to serve as a practical evaluation framework for guiding the development of more capable AI scientists and for helping biologists identify AI systems that can effectively support real-world research workflows. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/EperLuo/BAISBench, https://huggingface.co/datasets/EperLuo/BaisBench.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBenchmarkingComputational BiologyHumansIntelligent SystemsLarge Language ModelsSingle-Cell Analysis

Identifiers

PMID42412809
PMCPMC13340177

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.