Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42412831›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026

OrgNet+: towards robust protein stability prediction with convolutional neural networks.

Anastasia Sarycheva, Aleksandr Shumilov, Petr Popov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anastasia SarychevaSchool of Science, Constructor University Bremen gGmbH, Bremen 28759, Germany.
Aleksandr ShumilovSchool of Science, Constructor University Bremen gGmbH, Bremen 28759, Germany.
Petr PopovSchool of Science, Constructor University Bremen gGmbH, Bremen 28759, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3745-7154

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationPredicting the effect of single-point mutations on protein stability is a central problem in molecular biology and protein engineering. Recent structure-based deep learning methods, particularly 3D convolutional neural networks (3D CNNs), have achieved strong predictive performance by leveraging high-resolution protein structures. However, proteins exist as heterogeneous conformational ensembles rather than single static structures, and the impact of conformational flexibility on structure-based ΔΔG predictors remains poorly characterized. Consequently, current models may yield unstable or even contradictory predictions when evaluated across alternative, yet equally plausible, conformations of the same protein.

resultsWe introduce OrgNet+, a conformational ensemble-aware and orientation-gnostic framework that explicitly incorporates protein structure flexibility during training. OrgNet+ is trained on augmented datasets comprising diverse conformational ensembles generated using a comprehensive set of molecular modelling methods: normal mode analysis, molecular dynamics, Monte-Carlo simulations, and a generative deep learning model. Across all ensemble types, OrgNet+ substantially reduces intra-ensemble prediction variance while simultaneously improving predictive accuracy. The improved performance extends to standard single-reference-structure benchmarks, even though OrgNet+ was trained exclusively on conformational ensembles and never exposed to the reference experimental structures. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: OrgNet+ is available at https://github.com/i-Molecule/OrgNet.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyProteinsSoftwareConvolutional Neural NetworksDeep LearningMolecular Dynamics SimulationPrediction AlgorithmsProtein ConformationProtein StabilityProteins

Identifiers

PMID42412831
PMCPMC13340226

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.