ArticlePlant physiology2026
A deep learning model captures position-specific effects of plant regulatory sequences and suggests genes under complex regulation.
Article in Plant physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Upstream, downstream: nemo learns where plant regulatory sequences act.Plant physiology · 2026Article
- Synthetic promoter design in plants: integration of computational and experimental approaches.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep neural networks can be trained to predict gene expression directly from genomic sequence, thereby implicitly learning regulatory sequence patterns from scratch, minimizing the bias imposed by prior assumptions. A challenging, yet promising prospect is the extraction of novel insights into gene-regulatory mechanisms by probing and interpreting such gene expression models. Using a branched convolutional neural network architecture trained on promoter and terminator sequences, we predict gene expression for allopolyploid Brassica napus and the closely related model organism Arabidopsis thaliana. We validate the model by comparing predicted and measured expression across ecotypes. We also show that deep learning models can successfully capture the positional binding preferences of some transcription factor families without having been trained on transcription factor binding data. Furthermore, we show that our model did not only detect local sequence patterns but was also able to determine their function based on their positional context. We also found that increased prediction error correlated with additional more distal or epigenetic regulatory input. Our results demonstrate that deep learning can be used to understand the regulatory architecture of gene expression in plants. A better understanding of gene regulation in the context of polyploid genomes is of particular economic importance due to their prevalence among major crops. In the future, we hope that such models may facilitate the targeted engineering of gene regulation in crops.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.