ArticleThe Journal of medicine and philosophy2026
Human Enhancement: A Conceptual Scoping Review.
Article in The Journal of medicine and philosophy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Moral bioenhancement refers to the use of biological or technological interventions to make a moral agent better as a moral agent. The literature often fails to acknowledge critical underlying assumptions and differences in how the term is understood and applied. This scoping review of the moral bioenhancement literature offers a conceptual geography of terms, definitions, and ethical considerations raised in the literature to advance analysis and discussion. It reveals ambiguities that are central to but not always addressed in the literature. Eight key areas are identified, and an overview of the relevant differences in each area is provided: definitions, types of interventions, targets of enhancement, reasons identified for pursuing moral enhancement, objections to or concerns with moral enhancement, the conditions under which moral enhancement is permissible or obligatory, whether and how authors invoke character and virtue, and whether and what role the concepts of transhumanism or post-personhood play.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.