ReviewNature protocols2026
CODAvision: best practices and a user-friendly interface for rapid, customizable segmentation of medical images.
Review in Nature protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Whole organism 3D mapping reveals universal branching topology and biophysical optimization governs vascular and nervous system development.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Deep Learning Enabled 3D Multi-Omic Analysis Reveals Molecular Signatures of Heterogeneous Response to Chemotherapy in Pancreatic Cancer.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Three-dimensional assessments are necessary to determine the true, spatially resolved composition of tissues.Cell reports methods · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Image-based machine learning tools are powerful resources for analyzing medical images, with deep learning-based semantic segmentation commonly utilized to enable the spatial quantification of structures visible in images. However, dataset generation and training of segmentation algorithms requires advanced programming skills and intricate workflows, limiting their accessibility to scientists without prior coding expertise. Here we present the step-by-step instructions to carry out automatic segmentation of medical images guided by a graphical user interface using the CODAvision algorithm. This workflow simplifies the process of semantic segmentation of microanatomical structures by enabling users to train highly customizable deep learning models without extensive coding expertise. The protocol outlines best practices for creating robust training datasets, configuring model parameters and optimizing performance across diverse biomedical image modalities. CODAvision enhances the usability of the CODA algorithm by streamlining parameter configuration, model training and performance evaluation, automatically generating quantitative results and comprehensive reports. We show the use of CODA to serial histology by demonstrating robust performance across numerous medical image modalities and diverse biological questions. We provide sample results in data types, including histology, magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography. We demonstrate the diverse use of this tool in applications, including quantification of metastatic burden in in vivo models and deconvolution of spot-based spatial transcriptomics datasets. This protocol is designed for researchers with interest in rapid design of highly customizable semantic segmentation algorithms and a basic understanding of programming and anatomy.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.