Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42414705›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2026

Transanal irrigation in clinical practice: a scoping review.

Elsa Splidt Jacobsen, Hugin Reistrup, Birthe Thing Oggesen, Jacob Rosenberg

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Transanal irrigation in clinical practice: a scoping review.International journal of colorectal disease · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elsa Splidt JacobsenCenter for Perioperative Optimization, Department of Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-9624-7007
Hugin ReistrupCenter for Perioperative Optimization, Department of Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark. hugin.reistrup@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6247-0057
Birthe Thing OggesenCopenhagen Sequelae Center CARE, Department of Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5722-4393
Jacob RosenbergCenter for Perioperative Optimization, Department of Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0063-1086

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTransanal irrigation is a treatment that promotes predictable bowel emptying and enhances daily management of incontinence and constipation for individuals with bowel disorders. We aimed to map the application of transanal irrigation in clinical practice.

methodsThis scoping review followed the PRISMA-ScR guideline, and the protocol was a priori registered at Open Science Framework. A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane CENTRAL. We included original studies on adults (≥ 18 years) treated with self-administered transanal irrigation in outpatient settings. The review investigated irrigation protocols, equipment, patient selection, outcome measures, and reported harms.

resultsNinety-two studies, including 4,821 adults (41% female), were included. Most studies were observational (51%), and 57% were published in the last decade. Transanal irrigation was most often used for neurogenic bowel dysfunction (36%) and post-surgical conditions (27%). Irrigation volumes ranged from 400 to 2400 ml. Time spent on irrigation typically ranged from 20 to 70 min. Irrigation was commonly performed daily or on alternate days. The Peristeen® system was the most frequently used device. Outcome measures were inconsistent, with 40 different tools used. Most harms reported were minor; however, very rare but serious complications, such as rectal perforation, were reported.

conclusionTransanal irrigation was widely used in adult outpatient care, particularly for neurogenic and post-surgical bowel dysfunction, with recurring patterns in irrigation practices. However, heterogeneous outcome reporting limits comparability, highlighting the need for standardized measures and clearer clinical guidance.

Indexed as

Anal CanalTherapeutic IrrigationFemaleHumansTreatment OutcomeBowel managementConstipationFecal incontinenceLow anterior resection syndromeTAITransanal irrigation

Identifiers

PMID42414705
PMCPMC13627169

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.