ArticleBMC neurology2026
Biological sex differences in neurodegenerative diseases in Africa: a scoping review of evidence and research gaps.
Article in BMC neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBiological sex is a well-established determinant of risk, progression, and therapeutic response in neurodegenerative diseases (NDs). However, current evidence on sex differences in NDs is from high-income Western populations. This review aims to map and synthesize evidence on biological sex differences in NDs in Africa, and to identify key research gaps.
methodsThis scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and reported in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A literature search was conducted on PubMed, African Journals Online, Sabinet Journals, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. We included studies conducted in African countries that reported sex disaggregated data or examined biological sex differences in at least one ND. Data were synthesized descriptively.
resultsAll included studies reported sex distribution, but most (about 84%) did so only descriptively. Approximately 17% conducted sex-stratified analyses beyond prevalence. Similar to global epidemiological trends, several studies suggested a higher prevalence or odds of dementia and multiple sclerosis among females, while male predominance was observed in Parkinson's disease and Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis studies. An earlier onset and a higher mutation frequency in LRRK2-G2019S were reported in females with Parkinson's disease in some studies, while another study reported a higher mortality rate in females with dementia. No study evaluated sex specific biomarker profiles, disease progression, or treatment response.
conclusionsEvidence on biological sex differences in NDs in Africa remains limited and is largely descriptive. Mechanistic, longitudinal, and biomarker-based investigations are largely absent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.