ArticleNutrition journal2026
Association of habitual diet and bone marrow adipose tissue - magnetic resonance imaging in a population-based sample.
Article in Nutrition journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBone marrow adipose tissue (BMAT) is a metabolically active fat depot that may influence bone and hematopoietic function, yet its relationship with habitual diet remains largely unexplored at the population level. As diet represents an easily modifiable factor, a better understanding of its role in bone health and potential sex-specific differences is needed.
objectiveWe examined how habitual intake of energy-providing nutrients (fat, carbohydrates, protein, alcohol) and micronutrients (calcium, phosphorus, vitamin D) relates to imaging-derived measures of BMAT.
methodsIn a sample from a population-based cohort, habitual diet was assessed based on a food frequency questionnaire and repeated 24 h recalls. Using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with a 2-point T1-weighted Dixon sequence, fat fraction of BMAT was quantified at vertebrae L1 and L2 in N = 297 participants (44% women, mean age 56.1 years, mean BMI 28.0 kg/m²) and at left and right femur in N = 163 participants (67% women, mean age 57.5 years, mean BMI 27.1 kg/m²) with available dietary data. Associations between habitual diet and BMAT were assessed using correlation analyses and linear regression models in the overall study population and stratified by sex, adjusting for age, BMI, physical activity, and diabetes status.
resultsMean vertebral and femoral BMAT were 54.8% and 86.5% in women, and 54.6% and 89.8% in men, respectively. Vertebral and femoral BMAT were positively correlated in women (ρ = 0.54, p < 0.001) and men (ρ = 0.36, p = 0.0096). Associations between habitual intake of energy-providing nutrients or micronutrients and BMAT were mostly non-significant across anatomical sites and sexes. Only in women, protein intake was positively associated with vertebral BMAT (β = 1.03, 95%CI [0.2, 1.9], p = 0.020, per percent of total energy intake). In men, an opposite effect direction was observed, which was not significant (β =-0.73, 95%CI [-1.6, 0.1], p = 0.096). For femoral BMAT, all associations were non-significant in either sex.
conclusionIn this population-based sample, habitual dietary intake of energy-providing nutrients and micronutrients showed no consistently significant association with vertebral or femoral BMAT in women and men. Opposite effect directions in men and women, as well as one significant association between protein intake and vertebral BMAT in women were observed in exploratory analyses. This may indicate potential site- and sex-specific differences, underlining the distinct biological properties of this adipose tissue depot.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.