ArticleJournal of biomedical semantics2026
OnTEPT: a multimodal OWL ontology for post-traumatic stress disorder.
Article in Journal of biomedical semantics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPost-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a heterogeneous neuropsychiatric condition that develops after exposure to traumatic events. Its diagnosis is currently governed by two major international classification systems, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) and International Classification of Diseases) ICD, which differ in structure, granularity, and diagnostic thresholds. Moreover, PTSD assessment is also multimodal, spanning structured interviews, self-report psychometric instruments, and increasing neurophysiological recordings such as electroencephalography (EEG).
objectiveThis study presents OnTEPT, an OWL-based multimodal ontology designed to formalize DSM-5 and ICD-11 diagnostic criteria, integrate psychometric instruments and EEG-derived features, and support automated reasoning over individual patient instances.
resultsOnTEPT was developed following Ontology Development 101 (OD101) in Protégé 5. A hybrid strategy was used, combining top-down and bottom-up approaches and reusing concepts from health and mental health ontologies. The current version includes 112 classes, 18 object properties, and 113 data properties. DSM-5 (A-H) and ICD-11 (1-6) criteria are formalized as OWL equivalence axioms. These use constraints on cardinality, duration, clinical significance, and exclusions. Dissociative and complex PTSD are also represented. Four instruments are modeled at the item-level with cutoff thresholds, and two of them are linked to diagnostic criteria through annotations. The ontology was populated with psychometric data from 304 patients, EEG data from 41 participants, and 30 structured synthetic instances generated with Owlready2. 36 quantitative EEG features are encoded as typed data properties. Validation with HermiT, Pellet, and FaCT + + confirmed logical consistency and class satisfiability. Four intentionally inconsistent instances were correctly rejected due to classification issues. Query-based validation retrieved 113 patients above screening thresholds. It also found three with full DSM-5 profiles, twelve under ICD-11, two with dissociative PTSD, and one with complex PTSD.
conclusionsOnTEPT provides a computable semantic framework that harmonizes PTSD diagnosis and its subtypes between DSM-5 and ICD-11. It integrates psychometric and EEG information within a single ontology. Its main contribution is an inferential layer that enables the automated classification of patient instances using both diagnostic systems. The architecture is extensible and ready to include biomarker-based rules, longitudinal data, and semantic workflows to support clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.