ReviewJournal of translational medicine2026
Metabolic regulation of macrophage polarization in myocardial infarction: from mechanisms to targeted therapies.
Review in Journal of translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMyocardial infarction (MI) elicits a tightly staged immune response in which macrophages coordinate early inflammation, subsequent tissue repair, and long-term ventricular remodeling. Growing evidence indicates that macrophage polarization is directed by immunometabolic reprogramming; however, the metabolic circuits that connect immune function to durable cardiac recovery remain incompletely defined. CONTENT: This review integrates current insights into the spatiotemporal, metabolic, and functional regulation of macrophages after MI. We summarize how glucose metabolism (glycolysis and the pentose phosphate pathway), TCA cycle rewiring and immunometabolic intermediates, lipid and amino-acid metabolism, iron handling and ferroptosis, purinergic and NAD⁺-dependent signaling, oxidative stress pathways, and vitamin-dependent regulation shape inflammatory versus reparative macrophage states. We highlight drug-targetable mediators-including lactate, succinate, α-KG, itaconate, kynurenine, and NAD⁺-linked pathways-and discuss how stage-specific targeting may suppress early injurious inflammation while promoting reparative remodeling. We also review advances in nanotechnology- and exosome-based delivery platforms that enable cardiac macrophage-directed interventions. OUTLOOK: Clinical translation will require deeper characterization of human macrophage heterogeneity, development of in vivo metabolic biomarkers, and validation in prospective multi-omics-anchored human studies. Temporally controlled combination therapies coupled with precision delivery systems may maximize cardiac repair while minimizing systemic metabolic toxicity.
conclusionsMacrophage immunometabolism is a central determinant of post-MI healing and remodeling. Therapeutic reprogramming of macrophage metabolism represents a promising precision-immunotherapy strategy to improve repair, limit heart failure progression, and expand future cardiovascular treatment options. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.