ReviewCritical care (London, England)2026
Obesity: biomechanical implications for mechanical ventilation.
Review in Critical care (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Obesity is a highly prevalent chronic disease that profoundly affects respiratory physiology. Excess adipose tissue alters lung volumes, chest-wall mechanics, and pleural pressures, leading to airway closure, atelectasis, and ventilation-perfusion mismatch. These changes have important implications for mechanical ventilation in both perioperative and critical care settings. This narrative review examines the impact of obesity on respiratory physiology during mechanical ventilation and discusses strategies for optimizing ventilatory management in patients with obesity and acute lung injury. Obesity primarily reduces functional residual capacity and expiratory reserve volume through cephalad displacement of the diaphragm and increased intra-abdominal pressure. These alterations promote airway collapse, impaired ventilation distribution, and mild hypoxemia. During general anesthesia, additional reductions in lung volume and increased pleural pressure further predispose patients with obesity to airway closure and atelectasis. Ventilatory management should include adequate preoxygenation, recruitment maneuvers when appropriate, and individualized positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration. In patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure or acute respiratory distress syndrome, excess adiposity may worsen respiratory mechanics by increasing superimposed pressure and the prevalence of airway closure. These mechanisms complicate interpretation of respiratory mechanics. Advanced bedside monitoring tools, including esophageal pressure manometry and electrical impedance tomography, may provide valuable insights for optimizing ventilatory settings and balancing lung recruitment with the risk of overdistension. In moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome, prone positioning is feasible and safe. Furthermore, individualized weaning approaches, and early use of noninvasive ventilation after extubation may further improve respiratory management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.