ArticleJournal of ovarian research2026
Construction and validation of a machine learning model for predicting early pregnancy in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Journal of ovarian research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivePolycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a leading cause of female infertility, and early pregnancy outcomes in affected women are affected by multiple interactive factors; however, no well-established predictive tools are available. This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning (ML) models for predicting early pregnancy in women with PCOS and compare the predictive performance of different ML algorithms.
methodsThis was a secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized controlled trial including 994 PCOS patients recruited from 21 research centers. Candidate predictors included reproductive history, ultrasound parameters, and serum hormone levels. Missing data were processed using multiple imputation. Variables were initially screened by LASSO regression, and final predictors were determined by univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Three ML models-random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and decision tree (DT)-were constructed. The dataset was randomly split into training (70%) and validation (30%) cohorts. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy, and F1 score.
resultsLASSO regression and logistic regression analyses identified four key predictors: body mass index (BMI), body weight, endometrial thickness, and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG). In the validation cohort, the RF model showed the best overall performance, with an AUC of 0.56 (95% CI: 0.493-0.628), sensitivity of 65.1%, and specificity of 47.0%. All models exhibited moderate predictive efficacy with an AUC range of 0.505-0.56. The RF model yielded a PPV of 24.8%, NPV of 83.3%, accuracy of 50.8%, and F1 score of 0.360.
conclusionML-based predictive models for early pregnancy in PCOS patients were successfully established. All models demonstrated moderate discriminative ability, with the RF model showing relatively superior performance. These models may serve as adjunctive tools for clinical decision-making, while the moderate predictive power underscores the multifactorial complexity of early pregnancy in PCOS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.