ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2026
Four different fixation strategies for ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures: a finite element analysis.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIpsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures are complex injuries that result from high-energy trauma. Despite the availability of multiple fixation strategies, optimal surgical management remains a subject of ongoing debate and comparative biomechanical data are lacking. This study evaluated the stability of four commonly used constructs for internal fixation using patient-specific finite element analysis (FEA) to provide a robust biomechanical rationale for surgical decision-making.
methodsPatient-specific FEA models were reconstructed using computed tomography imaging data of eight patients to simulate a complex injury pattern involving an ipsilateral Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture combined with a comminuted femoral shaft fracture. Four distinct internal fixation strategies were evaluated: proximal femoral nail antirotation, compression plate with cannulated screws, antegrade intramedullary nail with cannulated screws (AN-CS), and long proximal femoral locking plate. Stability parameters were quantified under simulated axial and torsional loading conditions to assess the mechanical performance of each construct.
resultsUnder both loading conditions, the AN-CS group consistently maintained low levels of femoral and implant displacement while demonstrating a more uniform stress distribution and minimum interfragmentary motion at the femoral neck fracture site.
conclusionOf the four fixation methods evaluated in this simulation study, the AN-CS construct exhibited the best biomechanical performance overall. The AN-CS fixation effectively balanced interfragmentary stability with a uniform stress distribution, thereby providing a biomechanical basis to guide subsequent clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.