ReviewBMC chemistry2026
Plant-based milk powders: technological challenges, nutritional opportunities, and market outlook.
Review in BMC chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The global demand for plant-based milk has increased in response to health, sustainability, and dietary concerns. Liquid products are not without their advantages, but powdered forms offer unique benefits, including shelf stability, lightweight distribution, and versatile food applications. Despite the growth in market value, there is a paucity of systematic research addressing the processing of plant-based milk powders, particularly the influence of drying technologies and formulation strategies on yield, nutrient retention, and functionality. This review synthesizes recent advances in the production of plant-based milk powders, focusing on pretreatment, drying technologies, and carrier systems. Spray drying remains the dominant industrial process and is valuable for scalability but is limited by stickiness, poor flow, and low solubility. Enzymatic pretreatments have been shown to yield consistent increases in yield and improvements in suspension stability. The optimization of feed concentration and atomization parameters is imperative, and studies have identified inlet temperatures ranging from 140 to 170 °C as optimal for balancing yield and nutrient retention. The influence of carrier agents on performance is a subject of considerable interest. Maltodextrin, for example, has been shown to increase drying efficiency, although it concurrently reduces nutritional quality. Protein and gum-based carriers, while demonstrating potential, remain underexplored. A variety of alternative methods have been demonstrated to increase the retention of bioactive compounds, reduce energy consumption, and improve flowability. These methods include dehumidified air spray drying, pulse spray drying, freeze drying, and foam-mat drying. However, these methods are not easily scalable. The application of agglomeration and postprocessing techniques has been demonstrated to further enhance the reconstitution process and improve consumer acceptability. The advancement of plant-based milk powders necessitates the establishment of a connection between laboratory findings and industrial application. Subsequent research should concentrate on the optimization of hybrid drying technologies, the diversification of carrier systems, and the development of standardized protocols to ensure nutritional quality, functionality, and commercial viability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.