ArticleThe Journal of animal ecology2026
Enter Salmon: Trophic risk mediates riverine barrier-crossing behaviours of parr.
Article in The Journal of animal ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Native and Non-Native Populations Respond Unevenly to River Barrier Removals.Global change biology · 2026Pooled it
- Enter Salmon: Trophic risk mediates riverine barrier-crossing behaviours of parr.The Journal of animal ecology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Freshwater biota are highly threatened by global stressors, among which fragmentation by artificial barriers has gained increasing attention in recent years. Barriers limit the movements of native species, notably the migrations of keystone fish, such as Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), with ecological and socio-economic consequences. The severity of barrier impacts on salmon smolt and adult migratory stages has widely overshadowed the effects on juvenile river-resident stages, despite the importance of habitat availability during these years. We present the first study of crossing behaviours displayed by salmon parr traversing obstacles while considering trophic context-dependencies. Using semi-natural flume tanks and a multifactorial design, we examined two of the most common weir designs (vertical and v-notch) and simulated risk-reward conditions (model predator and chemosensory food resource cues), with approaching, assessing, attempting and crossing behaviours analysed. We found that fish movements throughout the tank were significantly impeded by both barrier designs compared to barrier-free controls, of which the v-notch presented a moderately greater challenge. These effects were further mediated by perceived predatory threat, with the presence of a potential predator significantly reducing the probability and latency of fish approaching, reducing the probability of assessing the barrier, as well as shortening the average duration of barrier crossings. Resource presence had minimal effects on the behaviours investigated, except for a significant interaction with predator presence influencing assessment duration. Our study demonstrates that barriers, regardless of their design, place significant limitations on habitats available to parr by reducing overall movement in the system. However, the behaviour of salmon parr around artificial barriers is context-dependent, highlighting the complexity of fish-barrier interactions and raising important questions about the potential benefits and unknown consequences of barrier removals within existing ecological networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.