ArticleThe Canadian journal of urology2026
Study on automatic recognition of stone composition in intraoperative endoscopic images-a single center study.
Article in The Canadian journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesUrinary stone composition critically influences treatment selection and recurrence prevention, yet current intraoperative assessment remains imprecise. This study aims to achieve intraoperative prediction of stone composition by applying a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) to routinely captured endoscopic images.
methodsWe retrospectively studied endoscopic images from stone-breaking surgeries in Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital during 2022-12-2024-12. Images were captured before and after laser lithotripsy. Based on postoperative infrared spectroscopy, stones were divided into five categories. In total, 1780 images (1167 from RIRS, 613 from PCNL) were included and split into training and testing sets at an 8:2 ratio. Using ResNet-50 as the base model, only endoscopic digital images and stone classification data were input for minimal-supervision learning. After training, the model accuracy for each stone category surpassed 95%. The model was then tested on 20% of RIRS and RIRS+PCNL images, with 3D PCA and Grad-cam for visual analysis.
resultsFor the RIRS image test set: The precision was 93.8% for the calcium oxalate group (n = 147), 96.3% for the calcium oxalate mixed with a uric acid group (n = 30), 91.8% for the calcium oxalate mixed with carbonate apatite group (n = 106), 88.9% for the struvite mixed with calcium oxalate and carbonate apatite group (n = 16), and 100% for the stone free control group (n = 26) (Table 1). Total accuracy for CNN modeling is:94.16%, AUC:0.99, weighted F1-Score: 0.9353, weighted F1-score 95% CI: (0.9089, 0.9599), weighted Kappa: 0.9122, weighted Kappa 95% CI: (0.8523, 0.9569).For the RIRS+PCNL image test set: The precision was 94.9% for the calcium oxalate group (n = 195), 98.7% for the calcium oxalate mixed with a uric acid group (n = 80), 92.2% for the calcium oxalate mixed with carbonate apatite group (n = 111), 100% for the struvite mixed with calcium oxalate and carbonate apatite group (n = 29), and 93.8% for the stone free control group (n = 26) (Table 2).Total accuracy: 95.92%, AUC: 0.99, weighted F1-Score: 0.9508, weighted F1-score 95% CI: (0.9304, 0.9708) weighted Kappa: 0.9357, weighted Kappa 95% CI: (0.8907, 0.9678).The 3D PCA projection results are as follows: PC1: 0.2723 (27.23%), PC2: 0.1102 (11.02%), PC3: 0.0801 (8.01%), Cumulative: 46.26%.
conclusionsThis study shows deep CNNs can identify renal stone compositions from intraoperative endoscopic images, differentiating pure and mixed components. This analysis is an alternative to traditional methods and has the potential to improve treatment effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42415583What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.