Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42415611›Full record

ArticleKidney research and clinical practice2026

Efficacy, safety, and dose selection of efepoetin alfa in anemic patients on maintenance dialysis: a phase 2, randomized, multicenter, active-controlled trial.

Eun Jeong Ko, Mi-Sun Byun, Chul Woo Yang, Sug Kyun Shin, Hyung Wook Kim, Byung Chul Shin, Seok Joon Shin, Hyeong Cheon Park, Young Sun Kang, Sang-Ho Lee and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney research and clinical practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Eun Jeong KoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Mi-Sun ByunGenexine, Inc., Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Chul Woo YangDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sug Kyun ShinDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, NHIS Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
Hyung Wook KimDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Byung Chul ShinDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chosun University Medical School, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.
Seok Joon ShinDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyeong Cheon ParkDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Young Sun KangDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, Republic of Korea.
Sang-Ho LeeDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ho Cheol SongDepartment of Internal Medicine, Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Su Hyun KimDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ki Young NaDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Young-Il JoDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Won KimDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Jeonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Republic of Korea.
Eun Young SeongDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Republic of Korea.
Yong-Lim KimDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Hyunjoo RyuGenexine, Inc., Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Heewon KimGenexine, Inc., Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yoon-Jeong ChoiGenexine, Inc., Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Byung Ha ChungDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea. chungbh@catholic.ac.kr.

Funding

Korea Health Industry Development InstituteMinistry of Health and Welfare HI14C1038National Research Foundation of Korea 2018M3A9E802151
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEfepoetin alfa (GC1113, GX-E2) is a long-acting recombinant human erythropoietin fused to a hybrid fragment crystallizable (hyFc) that prolongs systemic exposure via neonatal Fc receptor-mediated recycling. This active-controlled phase 2 trial evaluated efepoetin alfa and informed phase 3 starting dose selection for chronic kidney disease-related anemia in dialysis patients.

methodsIn this multicenter, open-label, active-controlled trial, adults on hemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD) with hemoglobin (Hb) levels <10 g/dL were randomized after erythropoiesis-stimulating agent discontinuation. Over 12 weeks, HD patients received intravenous efepoetin alfa (5 or 8 µg/kg once weekly [Q1W], 8 µg/kg every 2 weeks [Q2W]) or darbepoetin alfa (30 µg Q1W). PD patients received subcutaneous efepoetin alfa (5 or 8 µg/kg Q2W) or methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta (0.6 µg/kg Q2W). The primary endpoint was the mean Hb change from baseline after 12 weeks of treatment, and an exploratory dose-conversion ratio (DCR) analysis was performed in the PD cohort to inform phase 3 dosing.

resultsEfepoetin alfa showed dose-dependent Hb increases. In the HD cohort, mean Hb increases were 3.19 g/dL for efepoetin alfa 5 and 8 µg/kg Q1W and 2.52 g/dL for darbepoetin alfa. In the PD cohort, mean Hb increases were 2.69 g/dL and 3.48 g/dL for efepoetin alfa 5 and 8 µg/kg Q2W, respectively, and 2.01 g/dL for the control group. Exploratory DCR analysis supported 4 µg/kg Q2W efepoetin alfa as the phase 3 starting dose.

conclusionEfepoetin alfa demonstrated dose-dependent erythropoietic efficacy and an acceptable safety profile in dialysis patients, supporting dose-range characterization and phase 3 starting dose selection.

Indexed as

AnemiaChronic renal insufficiencyEfepoetin alfaErythropoietinRenal dialysis

Identifiers

PMID42415611
PMCPMC13575264

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.