SynthesisFrontiers in public health2026
The effects of different types of exercise on cognitive function in the older adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Global population aging is accelerating, and age-related cognitive decline has emerged as a core public health concern impacting the health and quality of life of older adults. Physical exercise, a low-cost, low-risk non-pharmacological intervention, has been validated to delay cognitive decline. However, there is no consensus yet on the relative effectiveness of different exercise types in improving cognitive function among older adults individuals with cognitive health issues and those with MCI. This highlights the urgent need to determine the best intervention strategies through evidence-based medicine. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, SCOPUS, Web of Science and CNKI, with a search cutoff date of December 31, 2025. Initial database searches and reference list screening identified 3,816 records. Effect sizes were synthesized using the standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The intervention efficacy of different exercise types was ranked via Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve (SUCRA) values. Subgroup analyses, sensitivity analyses, and publication bias assessments were also performed.Statistical analyses adopted a random-effects consistency model for network Meta-analysis, with node-splitting method to test inconsistency. Results: A total of 18 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 1,316 older adults were ultimately included. Meta-analysis results demonstrated that various exercise types exerted significant beneficial effects on cognitive function in older adults: MMSE, MT yielded the optimal intervention effect; MoCA, ST and RT were the most effective; WAIS, ST and AT demonstrated significant benefits; WCST, AT exhibited a statistically significant intervention effect (SMD = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.11-1.12). Conclusion: Physical exercise effectively enhances multi-dimensional cognitive function in older adults, with distinct intervention advantages associated with different exercise types. In clinical practice, MT, RT, ST, or AT may be prioritized as intervention strategies based on the individual's cognitive assessment results and health status. It is recommended to adopt a moderate-intensity exercise regimen of "60-90 min per session, ≥3 times per week, and lasting ≥12 weeks" to maximize cognitive benefits. This study provides high-level evidence-based medical support for formulating exercise prescriptions to maintain cognitive function in older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.