ReviewFrontiers in medicine2026
Phenotype-driven management of diabetic macular edema: multimodal imaging biomarkers and individualized therapy.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetic macular edema (DME) remains a leading cause of vision impairment worldwide. Although intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents are widely regarded as first-line treatment, a substantial proportion of patients demonstrate suboptimal responses, ranging from anatomical non-resolution to functional plateau, reflecting the marked pathophysiological heterogeneity of the disease. Multimodal retinal imaging, particularly optical coherence tomography (OCT), OCT angiography (OCTA), and ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography (UWF-FA)- has enabled detailed characterization of retinal structural and microvascular alterations and facilitated the identification of clinically relevant imaging biomarkers. This review synthesizes established and emerging imaging biomarkers and groups them into two major domains. First, markers of disease activity, represented by intraretinal and subretinal fluid and hyperreflective foci. Second, predictors of visual prognosis, including disorganization of the retinal inner layers, photoreceptor damage, and retinal perfusion deficits. Crucially, based on characteristic biomarker profiles, we propose stratifying DME into five principal clinical phenotypes: the leakage-dominant, inflammatory, tractional, focal-treatment, and poor-prognosis phenotypes. Integrating these phenotypes into proposed, hypothesis-generating decision-support framework-encompassing baseline assessment, phenotype-based stratification, and dynamic optimization, aims to align therapeutic strategies to be more precisely aligned with underlying pathogenic mechanisms. Future developments, including automated biomarker quantification and artificial intelligence-assisted image analysis, may further enhance precision in DME phenotyping and support a definitive shift towards truly individualized disease management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.