SynthesisFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
Diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence for tuberculosis detection from cough sounds: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis on Innovative Approaches in Tuberculosis Diagnosis: Challenges and Future Directions.International journal of MCH and AIDS · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tuberculosis (TB) remains the leading cause of death from infectious diseases globally, with significant diagnostic challenges in low- and middle-income countries. Artificial intelligence (AI) analysis of cough sounds could offer an inexpensive and accessible solution for detecting TB. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of AI-based cough sound analysis for screening TB and identified key methodological gaps. We performed a systematic review (PROSPERO: CRD420250656065), searching PubMed, Scopus, IEEE, Web of Science, and CINAHL for studies published between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2024. Included studies focused on the application of AI-algorithms for TB screening based on cough sound analysis. Risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-AI tool. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve were extracted to quantify diagnostic performance. Overall, 14 studies were found, largely from Asia and Africa. Although a meta-analysis of seven studies showed a pooled sensitivity of 91% (95% CI: 88-94%) and a specificity of 89% (95% CI: 85-92%), with a diagnostic odds ratio of 81.61 and an area under the curve of 0.9539, indicating strong diagnostic accuracy, most of the included studies focused on analytical validity. Artificial intelligence models for cough sounds might improve TB detection, particularly in resource-limited settings, by offering a non-invasive, rapid screening tool. However, the high risk of bias, heterogeneity, and reliance on internal validation highlights the need for multicenter clinical validity studies before adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.