Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42415952›Full record

ReviewBJUI compass2026

Recognition to repair: Managing reservoir complications in inflatable penile prosthesis surgery.

Sarah Michael, Peter Grice, Adam Oumeziane, Michael George, David Riding, Deena Harji, Theodora Stasinou, Ian Pearce, Vaibhav Modgil

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BJUI compass, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sarah MichaelManchester Andrology Research Collaborative Manchester Royal Infirmary Manchester UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9310-0478
Peter GriceManchester Andrology Research Collaborative Manchester Royal Infirmary Manchester UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7366-4233
Adam OumezianeManchester University NHS Foundation Trust Manchester UK.
Michael GeorgeManchester Andrology Research Collaborative Manchester Royal Infirmary Manchester UK.
David RidingManchester Vascular Centre Manchester Royal Infirmary Manchester UK.
Deena HarjiDepartment of Colorectal Surgery Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust Manchester UK.
Theodora StasinouManchester Andrology Research Collaborative Manchester Royal Infirmary Manchester UK.
Ian PearceManchester Andrology Research Collaborative Manchester Royal Infirmary Manchester UK.
Vaibhav ModgilManchester Andrology Research Collaborative Manchester Royal Infirmary Manchester UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Reservoir placement during three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) implantation is the step most commonly associated with serious intraoperative complications. The reservoir is traditionally positioned within the space of Retzius, where it lies in close proximity to the bladder, bowel and major pelvic vessels. Although injuries are uncommon, damage to these structures can result in significant morbidity, particularly in patients with prior pelvic surgery, radiotherapy or distorted pelvic anatomy. As prosthetic surgery expands to more complex patient populations, surgeons must be prepared to recognise and manage these complications when they occur. Results: This review focuses on the intraoperative injuries associated with reservoir insertion during IPP surgery and provides a practical framework for their recognition and management. Bladder, bowel and vascular injuries are discussed with emphasis on intraoperative warning signs, methods of confirmation and immediate management strategies. Key principles of repair, haemorrhage control and involvement of specialist surgical teams are outlined. Guidance is also provided on intraoperative decision-making, including when reservoir relocation, staged implantation or procedure abandonment may be appropriate to minimise the risk of prosthesis infection and other complications. Alternative reservoir placement techniques are briefly discussed in the context of risk reduction, particularly for patients with hostile pelvic anatomy. However, the primary aim of this review is to provide pragmatic guidance for surgeons confronted with intraoperative complications during reservoir insertion. Conclusions: Early recognition, prompt management and a structured approach to intraoperative decision-making are essential to minimise morbidity and preserve the favourable functional outcomes associated with IPP surgery.

Indexed as

penile implantpenile implant intraoperative complicationspenile prosthesisreservoir injuriesreservoir‐related complications

Identifiers

PMID42415952
PMCPMC13338707

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.