Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42415981›Full record

ArticleConservation physiology2026

The relevance and application of measures of thermal tolerance to fish ecology, conservation and aquaculture.

Anthony K Gamperl, E Don Stevens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anthony K GamperlDepartment of Ocean Sciences, Memorial University of Newfoundland and Labrador, 0 Marine Lab Road, St. John's NL A1C 5S7, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9852-4819
E Don StevensDepartment of Biomedical Science, Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, PE C1A 4P3, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past 20 years, the fish research community has invested considerable effort into measuring the thermal tolerance limits of many freshwater and marine species. We have learned a lot regarding mechanisms that determine tolerance limits, and how climate-related warming of aquatic environments may affect fish biology, ecology and distribution. However, in our opinion, some research has used methods that are likely to provide inaccurate estimates of thermal tolerance with respect to wild and cultured fish populations. Given the rate of global warming, the increase in the frequency and severity of heat waves, and that these challenges are often combined with other climate change-related stressors (e.g. hypoxia, increased pathogen prevalence), we need to ensure that future efforts are more effectual for species' conservation and management. Herein, we provide a comprehensive and critical review of the methods currently used to measure the sub-lethal and lethal thermal limits of fishes, and discuss the relevance of these methods to fishes in the wild or in culture. In part, our aim is to educate fisheries managers and conservationists about what information is relevant to efforts to preserve species and biodiversity in the face of climate change. Finally, we provide explicit recommendations for researchers designing future thermal tolerance experiments.

Indexed as

Adaptationcritical thermal maximacritical thermal minimahypoxiaincipient temperaturesincremental thermal maximalethalphysiologysub-lethaltemperature

Identifiers

PMID42415981
PMCPMC13339953

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.