ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
Comparative assessment of tissue cross-reactivity and pharmacokinetic half-life of malaria monoclonal antibodies.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the Methods: TCR assay was performed across 14 human tissue types using the CSP mAbs 317 and 311 and the clinical reference mAb CIS43. The HLE optimization was performed on mAb 311 by introducing Fc modifications that improve affinity for human neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn). Safety and pharmacokinetic parameters of the modified mAb 311-LS and the wild-type 311-WT was determined by intravenous administration in the rhesus PK model at 10 mg/kg dose. Concentration of the mAbs was measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and biolayer interferometry. Results: TCR assay showed no membrane binding, but the major repeat-specific mAbs 317 and 311 exhibited varying degrees of positive cross-reactivity to extracellular and cytoplasmic elements in multiple tissue types. In contrast, the clinical reference mAb CIS43 (junctional epitope) showed no TCR positivity. The prototype mAb 311 binding affinity to human neonatal Fc receptor (FcRN) was significantly improved by introducing commonly known HLE mutations. MAb 311-LS was found safe and showed an improved pharmacokinetic profile compared to the wild-type mAb 311. Discussion: These findings highlight the critical need to evaluate TCR liabilities early in the mAb process development cycle. The successful improvement of mAb 311-LS half-life demonstrates that Rhesus is an excellent model to compare HLE strategies. The developability benchmarks described here will help in the translation of novel, long-acting anti-malarial mAbs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.