ArticleAlpha psychiatry2026
Transdiagnostic Assessment of Mental Health and Sleep Registry: Protocol for a Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Alpha psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mental disorders impose a substantial burden on individuals and society that cannot be fully captured by diagnostic labels or clinial indicators alone. Accordingly, the need for approaches that comprehensively assess patients' subjective experiences and daily functioning is growing. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) enable multidimensional assessment from the patient's perspective and are increasingly important in mental health research. However, prior studies have frequently assessed these domains in isolation using different instruments and assessment schedules, limiting individual-level integration and cross-study comparability. The focus on single diagnostic groups has further impeded transdiagnostic understanding, and the lack of harmonized data standards has restricted data sharing and reuse. This study protocol describes the establishment of the Transdiagnostic Assessment of Mental Health and Sleep (TAMS) registry, a multidimensional PROs registry designed to enable transdiagnostic comparisons across individuals with mental disorders and physical conditions, as well as healthy participants. Methods and Analysis: We will conduct a nationwide registry-based cross-sectional study in Japan. Participants will include adults with mental disorders, those with physical conditions, and healthy participants, recruited through an online survey company. After providing electronic consent, all participants will complete an online survey providing information on demographics, diagnoses, and treatment. The registry will also capture information on Quality of Life (QOL) as well as related psychosocial factors, psychiatric symptoms, sleep characteristics, and attitudes toward digital health technology. Data collection is planned for March 2026, with a target enrollment of 3300 participants. Planned analyses will validate patient-reported instruments and characterize how these variables are related to QOL. Ethics and Dissemination: This study has received ethical approval (ID R07-137) and will be conducted in accordance with national information security guidelines, with voluntary participation, digital informed consent, and findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and plain-language summaries. The registry will be released as a publicly accessible dataset in accordance with the data-sharing guidelines of the FAIR principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable). Clinical Trial Registration: The study has been registered on https://jrct.mhlw.go.jp/ (registration number: jRCT1030250737; registration link: https://jrct.mhlw.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCT1030250737).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.