ArticleAlpha psychiatry2026
Expert Consensus on the Use of Lurasidone for Bipolar I Depression in Asian Patients.
Article in Alpha psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Eight psychiatrists from Malaysia, Singapore, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Thailand participated in three meetings using the RAND Corporation/University of California Los Angeles (RAND/UCLA) appropriateness method to establish expert consensus on the use of lurasidone for bipolar I depression in Asian patients. The first meeting generated clinical questions and statements for voting, the second refined these statements, and the third addressed disagreements or areas of uncertainty. Consensus was defined as ≥66% agreement that a statement was appropriate or extremely appropriate. Nearly all proposed statements achieved consensus, including the use of lurasidone as a first-line treatment for first-episode bipolar I depression in adults, with a starting dose of 20 mg/day and titration up to 120 mg/day as needed, as well as its use as adjunctive therapy with mood stabilizers. For elderly patients, a lower dose range of 20-80 mg/day was recommended, while for children and adolescents, a dose range of 20-80 mg/day with careful monitoring was suggested. Lurasidone was considered to have a lower risk of inducing mania or hypomania compared with placebo, conventional antidepressants, and certain antipsychotics, and was associated with a favorable cardiometabolic profile and generally manageable side effects, including nausea, akathisia, and somnolence. Caution was advised when prescribing lurasidone during pregnancy, particularly in the first trimester. This expert consensus provides practical guidance for the use of lurasidone in the treatment of bipolar I depression in Asian patients, complementing existing treatment guidelines and addressing dosing strategies, side effect management, and use in special populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.