Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42416230›Full record

ArticleEcancermedicalscience2026

Reducing delays in radiotherapy initiation post CT simulation: a quality improvement study from a rural cancer center in India.

Pragyat Thakur, Nagarjun Ballari, Anureet Kaur, Tapas Kumar Dora, I Vedamanasa, Arshdeep Kaur, Ashish Gulia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecancermedicalscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pragyat ThakurDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital and Research Centre (HBCHRC), Tata Memorial Centre, Affiliated to Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mullanpur, Punjab, India.
Nagarjun BallariDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital and Research Centre (HBCHRC), Tata Memorial Centre, Affiliated to Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mullanpur, Punjab, India.
Anureet KaurDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital and Research Centre (HBCHRC), Tata Memorial Center, Affiliated to Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mullanpur, Punjab, India.
Tapas Kumar DoraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital and Research Centre (HBCHRC), Tata Memorial Centre, Affiliated to Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mullanpur, Punjab, India.
I VedamanasaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital and Research Centre (HBCHRC), Tata Memorial Centre, Affiliated to Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mullanpur, Punjab, India.
Arshdeep KaurDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital and Research Centre (HBCHRC), Tata Memorial Centre, Affiliated to Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mullanpur, Punjab, India.
Ashish GuliaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital (HBCH), Tata Memorial Centre, Affiliated to Baba Farid University of Health Sciences (BFUHS), Sangrur, Punjab, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiation therapy (RT) is a cornerstone in the treatment of solid tumours, with more than half of all cancer patients requiring it for curative or palliative intent. However, delays in initiating RT after CT simulation (CT sim) can significantly impact clinical outcomes by increasing recurrence risk, triggering re-simulation due to anatomical shifts and causing psychological and logistical distress for patients and caregivers. This prospective quality improvement (QI) study was conducted at a rural cancer center in India from April to December 2022, aiming to reduce the time from CT sim to RT initiation. Using the A3 methodology in collaboration with Enable Quality, Improve Patient Care India, Stanford Medicine and the National Cancer Grid, a root cause analysis was conducted, followed by key driver identification via Pareto analysis. A series of Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles led to targeted interventions, including written standard operating procedures (SOPs) for scheduling, standardised patient instructions, clearly defined staff roles and stakeholder education. Data from 200 patients planned for radical treatment were analysed weekly, with treatment timelines plotted on a run chart. At baseline, the median delay from simulation to treatment initiation was 18 days. After implementation of interventions in July 2022, this was reduced to 12 days by September and further to 10 days by November, a 44.4% reduction . Additionally, the re-simulation rate dropped from 10% to less than 1%. No patient experienced a delay beyond the prescribed date, and importantly, staff feedback confirmed that the revised workflow did not increase perceived workload. The interventions were institutionalised through SOPs and monitored via real time dashboards, ensuring sustainability into 2024. This study demonstrates that targeted, system-level interventions developed using accessible QI methodologies can lead to meaningful reductions in RT delays and operational inefficiencies in low-resource environments. The model is feasible, cost-effective and adaptable to other cancer centers aiming to optimise timely RT delivery and improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

CT simulationquality improvementradiotherapyroot cause analysistime to treatmenttreatment delayworkflow redesign

Identifiers

PMID42416230
PMCPMC13338352

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.