ArticleAphasiology2026
Reported symptoms and patterns of language impairment in bilingual speakers with primary progressive aphasia: a retrospective study.
Article in Aphasiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The relative scarcity of studies of bilingual speakers with primary progressive aphasia (PPA) leads to knowledge gaps regarding their symptoms and patterns of language impairment. It is unknown if PPA symptoms in bilingual speakers differ from those of monolingual speakers. In addition, it remains unclear if one of a bilingual speaker's languages is more vulnerable to the onset of symptoms and/or is better preserved. Furthermore, bilingualism factors (e.g. order/age of language acquisition (L1/L2) and language dominance) may explain patterns of impairment both within and across the variants of PPA. Aims: To characterize the bilingualism factors, speech and language symptoms, and patterns of language impairment in a retrospective cohort of bilingual speakers with PPA. Methods: In a large cohort ( Results: The presenting symptoms were mostly consistent with current PPA diagnostic criteria, although symptoms unique to bilingual speakers were reported. The language reported to first be impacted by PPA, as well as the less preserved language at the time of evaluation, was generally reported to be the less dominant language, regardless of PPA variant. These measures did not associate as closely with age/order of acquisition (L1 versus L2). Conclusion: Bilingual speakers with PPA may report additional symptoms that reflect their ability to speak more than one language. The less dominant language was most susceptible to the initial impact of PPA and also tended to the less preserved language at the time of evaluation. Future studies of bilingual speakers with neurodegenerative diseases should systematically consider bilingualism factors, which are likely to contribute to clinical presentation and disease progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.