ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2026
Physical activity levels and quality of life in osteoporosis patients.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Physical activity has been shown to support the maintenance of bone mineral density and reduce bone loss, particularly in older adults and individuals with osteoporosis, while also improving functional capacity and quality of life. Objective: This study aimed to determine physical activity levels and quality of life among adults with osteoporosis aged ≥35 years living in Johannesburg, South Africa. It was hypothesised that higher physical activity levels would be associated with improved quality-of-life outcomes. Methods: A quantitative, cross-sectional study was conducted using the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) and the Osteoporosis Assessment Questionnaire Version 2 (OPAQ 2.0). A total of 209 participants (mean age: 64 years) completed the combined questionnaire. Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, independent t tests, and correlation analyses were performed. Results: Most participants met physical activity guidelines through work-, transport-, or leisure-related activity, although vigorous-intensity activity was limited. Participants using private healthcare reported higher overall quality of life scores (73%) than those using public healthcare services (50%). The physical-functioning domain was rated highest (76%), followed by emotional well-being (58%) and social interaction (56%). Increased physical activity levels were associated with better quality of life outcomes. Conclusion: Although many participants demonstrated adequate physical activity levels, sedentary behaviour remained prevalent. Quality of life was most negatively impacted in the emotional and social domains. These findings highlight the potential importance of physical activity, particularly structured load-bearing exercise, in osteoporosis management and overall well-being. This study contributes rare South African data on osteoporosis, physical activity behaviour, and the potential role of biokinetics within both private and public healthcare settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.