Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42416380›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in neurology

Effects of transitional care interventions on rehospitalization, functional outcomes, and quality of life in stroke survivors: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Xiaoqin Yang, Yan Han, Yuntian Liu, Na Zhao, Yan He, Feipeng Li

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xiaoqin Yang *Affiliated Baotou Clinical College, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, China.
Yan Han *Department of Neurology, Inner Mongolia Baotou City Central Hospital, Baotou, China.
Yuntian LiuAffiliated Baotou Clinical College, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, China.
Na ZhaoNursing Department, Ordos Center Hospital, Ordos, China.
Yan HeAffiliated Baotou Clinical College, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, China.
Feipeng LiDepartment of Nursing Department, Baotou Central Hospital, Inner Mongolia, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effects of transitional care interventions on rehospitalization, functional outcomes, quality of life, mortality, and disability in stroke survivors. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 statement and registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251266063). PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and CINAHL were searched from inception to May 13, 2026. Additional searches were conducted in ClinicalTrials.gov, Google Scholar, and grey literature sources. Randomized controlled trials comparing transitional care interventions with usual care in adult stroke survivors were included. Dichotomous outcomes were pooled as risk ratios (RRs), and continuous outcomes were pooled as standardized mean differences (SMDs), both with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analyses were conducted according to follow-up duration. Sensitivity analyses, small-study-effect assessment, and GRADE certainty assessment were performed where appropriate. Results: Twenty-four randomized controlled trials involving 3,520 stroke survivors were included. Transitional care interventions reduced overall rehospitalization compared with usual care (RR = 0.59, 95% CI 0.40-0.88), with a more consistent effect within 3 months after discharge (RR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.29-0.82). Transitional care interventions improved activities of daily living (ADL) in the primary analysis (SMD = 0.43, 95% CI 0.20-0.67), although heterogeneity was substantial; after sensitivity analysis, the effect remained statistically significant but was attenuated (SMD = 0.22, 95% CI 0.07-0.37). Quality of life (QoL) improved overall (SMD = 0.67, 95% CI 0.37-0.96), particularly within 3 months (SMD = 0.74, 95% CI 0.54-0.94). No significant mortality reduction was observed (RR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.53-1.39). Transitional care interventions were associated with lower short-term disability measured by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS; SMD = -0.59, 95% CI -0.99 to -0.19), but this finding was limited by substantial heterogeneity. The certainty of evidence was moderate for short-term rehospitalization and short-term QoL, and low for ADL, mortality, and disability. Conclusion: Transitional care interventions probably reduce short-term rehospitalization and improve short-term QoL in stroke survivors. They may also improve ADL and short-term disability, but these findings should be interpreted cautiously because of heterogeneity, risk of bias, and possible small-study effects. Current evidence does not establish a clear mortality benefit.

Indexed as

activities of daily livingcontinuity of caremeta-analysisquality of liferehospitalizationstrokesystematic reviewtransitional care

Identifiers

PMID42416380
PMCPMC13337450

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.