Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42416391›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Towards responsible digital health implementation: A mixed-methods exploratory study developing a tool to assess workforce experience.

Bazuin Tom, Michiel Sebastiaan Oerbekke, Pauline Heus, Mike Petrus Theodora Kusters, Dave Anton Dongelmans, Annelies Visser, Arie Franx, Johann Klaus Götz Wietasch, Lotty Hooft, Maarten Jurriaan van der Laan

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Bazuin TomDepartment of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9134-9704
Michiel Sebastiaan OerbekkeJulius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1861-3046
Pauline HeusJulius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6886-4652
Mike Petrus Theodora KustersJulius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6178-1465
Dave Anton DongelmansDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8477-6671
Annelies VisserDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7102-2627
Arie FranxDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8801-5546
Johann Klaus Götz WietaschDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8001-5648
Lotty HooftJulius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7950-2980
Maarten Jurriaan van der LaanDepartment of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3125-1342

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Digital health technologies (DHTs) are increasingly implemented to improve efficiency, quality, and patient experience. However, conditions that could influence the impact on well-being of healthcare professionals (HCPs) are rarely assessed. Objective: To develop a tool to support policymakers, hospital administrators, and implementation teams in considering workforce experience and well-being implications of DHTs on HCPs. Methods: A mixed-methods study was conducted in three Dutch university medical centres. First, we re-analysed a scoping review on DHT-implementation, applying criteria focusing on HCP-related determinants and thematically analysing these within a modified Work-System model and Quintuple Aim framework. Second, we conducted a prioritisation survey using the Reweighted Priority-Setting tool to rank themes related to Results: From 73 eligible studies we extracted determinants, generating themes and subthemes, of which 44 mapped to Conclusion: We developed a reflective checklist to support structured consideration of conditions shaping workforce experience in DHT-implementation. The tool offers a starting point for embedding workforce conditions in DHT-governance.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence < generaldigital health < generalHCPhealthcare professionalimpacttoolwellbeing

Identifiers

PMID42416391
PMCPMC13338532

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.