Evidence mapPaperPMID 42416401Full record

ReviewExploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy2026

More than alternative estrogen receptors: the emerging role of GPER-1 and ERα36 in breast cancer.

Luis Molina Calistro, Rodrigo Flavio Torres, Johana Spies, Sonia Sánchez Meneses, María Soto, Joaquín Carrasco, Javiera Gálvez, Dayanara Muñoz, Javiera Soto, Yennyfer Arancibia

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Luis Molina CalistroFacultad de Ciencias, Universidad San Sebastián, Lago Panguipulli 1390, Puerto Montt 5501842, Chile.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7599-6525
Rodrigo Flavio TorresFacultad de Ciencias, Universidad San Sebastián, Lago Panguipulli 1390, Puerto Montt 5501842, Chile.
Johana SpiesFacultad de Ciencias, Universidad San Sebastián, Lago Panguipulli 1390, Puerto Montt 5501842, Chile.
Sonia Sánchez MenesesPosgrado en Ciencias Biológicas UATx, Centro Tlaxcala Biología de la Conducta, Doctorado en Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Autónoma de Tlaxcala, Tlaxcala, Tlax 90800, México.
María SotoFacultad de Ciencias para el Cuidado de la Salud, Universidad San Sebastián, Puerto Montt 5501842, Chile.
Joaquín CarrascoFacultad de Ciencias para el Cuidado de la Salud, Universidad San Sebastián, Puerto Montt 5501842, Chile.
Javiera GálvezFacultad de Ciencias para el Cuidado de la Salud, Universidad San Sebastián, Puerto Montt 5501842, Chile.
Dayanara MuñozFacultad de Ciencias para el Cuidado de la Salud, Universidad San Sebastián, Puerto Montt 5501842, Chile.
Javiera SotoFacultad de Ciencias para el Cuidado de la Salud, Universidad San Sebastián, Puerto Montt 5501842, Chile.
Yennyfer ArancibiaMillennium Nucleus of Neuroepigenetics and Plasticity (EpiNeuro), Santiago 8320000, Chile.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7453-7300

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer classification and therapeutic decision-making have traditionally relied on the evaluation of estrogen receptor alpha (ERα), PR, and HER2, yet this framework does not fully explain tumor heterogeneity, endocrine resistance, or estrogen responsiveness in ERα-negative contexts. Emerging evidence implicates non-genomic estrogen signaling mediated by membrane-associated receptors such as G protein-coupled estrogen receptor 1 (GPER-1) and ERα36. Acting as interconnected signaling nodes, these receptors activate MAPK/ERK and PI3K/AKT pathways and engage in crosstalk with receptors such as EGFR, promoting proliferation, cellular plasticity, and adaptive responses. Here, we propose an integrative framework based on three axes: endocrine resistance in ERα-positive tumors, estrogen responsiveness in ERα-negative subtypes, and environmental modulation of signaling. Within this model, GPER-1 and ERα36 form a coordinated network that extends beyond genomic mechanisms and converges on shared downstream effectors. These pathways also intersect with post-transcriptional regulation, tumor-microenvironment interactions, and extracellular vesicle-mediated communication, contributing to tumor progression and metastasis. Environmental ligands, such as bisphenol A, may further modulate signaling intensity, reinforcing plasticity and resistance phenotypes. Collectively, GPER-1 and ERα36 emerge as candidate biomarkers with diagnostic and therapeutic relevance. Their integration into multi-omics and functional classification strategies may refine breast cancer stratification and support more precise therapeutic approaches.

Indexed as

biomarkersBPAbreast cancer heterogeneitybreast cancer subtypesendocrine resistanceERα36GPER-1non-genomic estrogen signaling

Identifiers

PMID42416401
PMCPMC13337573

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.