ArticleFrontiers in physiology2026
A gradient-based optimization model for predicting decompression sickness risk.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Decompression sickness (DCS) is a low-incidence but potentially severe consequence of hyperbaric exposure. Probabilistic decompression models offer a framework to quantify this risk, yet their calibration is challenged by the scarcity of empirical outcome data. In this study, we propose a gradient-based optimization model to predict DCS probability, trained on 924 dive profiles from the US Navy Experimental Diving Unit XVal-He-9 tables, representing predefined DCS probabilities (2.3% and 4%), and optimized based on actual body tissues grouped in five compartments. The model achieved high predictive accuracy (MAE: 0.535%; RMSE: 0.694%) with consistent performance across training and test sets, indicating limited overfitting. Reduced accuracy was observed in intermediate depth ranges (100-130fsw or 30-39msw). Out-of-sample evaluation on 31 high-risk dives (three DCS cases) showed general agreement between predicted and observed incidence while suggesting a potential contribution of repetitive exposures not accounted for in the model. These results demonstrate that gradient-based optimization, trained based on existing probabilistic tables, seems to be capable of satisfactorily predicting decompression sickness risk for a given dive profile. Additionally, future studies can further adjust the loss function to account for individual or dive-related indicators, leading to a more individualized risk function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.