ArticleTraining and education in professional psychology2026
Advancing clinical psychology with improved doctoral training in science.
Article in Training and education in professional psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Clinical psychology is a young science. Psychological suffering remains extensive, with core scientific issues the subject of ongoing study and debate. Clinical practice depends on the research base for elucidating etiology, systematic improvements in provision of mental health care, improvements in public health, and credibility with clients and the larger public. Science-oriented training programs endeavor to develop students into independent scientists, clinicians, and/or administrators who produce knowledge and translate it to improve clinical care. Existing training standards accommodate programs with a heavy clinical focus and little to no research training. To accelerate scientific progress, these standards must also accommodate increased scientific and research training by reducing generalist requirements and increasing curricular flexibility for students. On net, these changes would allow clinical psychologists more opportunities to work at the level of the clinic, system, policy, or laboratory; and thereby accelerate scientific discovery and translation to understand and reduce mental health burdens in our society, all while existing programs, including practitioner-oriented programs, may continue to flourish.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.