Evidence mapPaperPMID 42416549Full record

ArticleSAGE open nursing

Patient-Engaged AI: The Nursing Path to Health Equity.

Razel B Milo, Caroline Etland, Nicole Martinez, Sheree Scott, Catherine De Leon, Patricia Calero, Christine Nibbelink, Jane Georges, Cynthia D Connelly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Razel B MiloHahn School of Nursing and Health Science, Beyster Institute for Nursing Research, University of San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9891-5369
Caroline EtlandHahn School of Nursing and Health Science, Beyster Institute for Nursing Research, University of San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Nicole MartinezHahn School of Nursing and Health Science, Beyster Institute for Nursing Research, University of San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Sheree ScottHahn School of Nursing and Health Science, Beyster Institute for Nursing Research, University of San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7684-8618
Catherine De LeonHahn School of Nursing and Health Science, Beyster Institute for Nursing Research, University of San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Patricia CaleroHahn School of Nursing and Health Science, Beyster Institute for Nursing Research, University of San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5253-3357
Christine NibbelinkHahn School of Nursing and Health Science, Beyster Institute for Nursing Research, University of San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Jane GeorgesHahn School of Nursing and Health Science, Beyster Institute for Nursing Research, University of San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Cynthia D ConnellyHahn School of Nursing and Health Science, Beyster Institute for Nursing Research, University of San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Artificial intelligence (AI) technology in healthcare has emerged as a highly effective tool for enhancing health data analysis and patient engagement. Recent research examining patients' use of AI applications for self-managing health demonstrates notable benefits but also raises multiple concerns, including exacerbation of health disparities. Furthermore, limited information is available regarding nurses' interactions with patient-engaged AI (PEAI) and its impact on the nurse-patient relationship. Objective: Developing new theoretical frameworks is essential to strengthening the evidence base for AI in nursing practice. The proposed middle-range theory constitutes a significant advancement toward delineating domains of nursing research to define AI utilization within the nurse-patient relationship and addressing health disparities. Methods: Walker and Avant's steps were used to construct the theory, define concepts, and synthesize the literature and models. Results: An integrated theory-building synthesis identified 28 articles, from which five key themes emerged as crucial for mitigating health equity gaps: communication, end-user trust and perceptions, technology and design, self-management, and ethics and privacy. These impact patient engagement and, in turn, are influenced by health literacy. Conclusion: Nursing research and practice are positioned to contribute critical evidence to close health disparities and redefine the nurse-patient relationship within the transformative context of the AI revolution.

Indexed as

AIartificial intelligencehealth disparityhealth equitynursing AI theoretical model

Identifiers

PMID42416549
PMCPMC13338546

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.