ArticleJCPP advances2026
Working with a youth mental health apprenticeship scheme to coproduce evidence synthesis: The youth mental health evidence synthesis hub.
Article in JCPP advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Meaningful involvement of young people in mental health research ensures that it is relevant and has impact. Traditional approaches to patient and public involvement often fail to provide sustainable and reciprocal engagement. We reflect on our experiences of working with an apprenticeship model as an alternative approach to involving young people in mental health research. Methods: We describe working with the Bradford Healthy Minds Apprentices, a group of 16- to 24-years-olds engaged in a year-long paid apprenticeship scheme. This partnership involved coproduction activities to develop the Youth Mental Health Evidence Synthesis Hub (Y-MHESH), including workshops, website design and short videos. We focussed on relationship-building and provided clear feedback to demonstrate how the research team had acted and adapted in response to input from the Apprentices. Results: Working with the Apprentices offered distinct benefits to both researchers and the young people, including community engagement, flexible collaboration and opportunities for future working. The Apprentices were an established and externally supported group which facilitated relationship-building. Their professional status fostered a more equal and reciprocal partnership. The Apprentices themselves gained research skills and were able to choose their level of involvement in Y-MHESH. Through regular feedback they felt their contributions were valued by the researchers, engendering trust. Challenges included adapting to group dynamics and preferred ways of working, limited availability, funding limitations, and unfamiliar payment processes. Conclusion: Partnerships with groups like the Healthy Minds Apprentices, who are paid and supported within a relevant organisation, can support reciprocal coproduction and community-linked, bottom-up research. We suggest that a similar university-based apprenticeship model could offer a way to sustainably involve young people in mental health research, as well as providing developmental opportunities for young people. While requiring institutional buy-in and flexibility, this approach to involving young people aligns closely with the university's commitment to public good.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.