Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42416692›Full record

ReviewImaging science in dentistry2026

Accuracy of deep learning in the detection of carotid calcifications on cone-beam computed tomography: A systematic review.

Gabriel de Toledo Telles-Araujo, Kettelyn Macêdo da Cruz, Mariela Peralta-Mamani, Thaís Feitosa Leitão de Oliveira Gonzalez, Patrícia Miranda Leite Ribeiro, Liliane Lins-Kusterer, Viviane Almeida Sarmento

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Imaging science in dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gabriel de Toledo Telles-AraujoDepartment of Medicine and Health, School of Medicine, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9577-2008
Kettelyn Macêdo da CruzDepartment of Surgery, Stomatology, Pathology, and Radiology, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0745-4990
Mariela Peralta-MamaniDepartment of Orthognathic Surgery, Hospital for Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies, University of São Paulo, Bauru, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0243-9194
Thaís Feitosa Leitão de Oliveira GonzalezDepartment of Dentistry, School of Medicine and Public Health of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1953-7409
Patrícia Miranda Leite RibeiroDepartment of Propaedeutics and Integrated Clinic, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4243-6887
Liliane Lins-KustererDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, School of Medicine, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3736-0002
Viviane Almeida SarmentoDepartment of Propaedeutics and Integrated Clinic, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4403-3659

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This systematic review aimed to describe the diagnostic performance of AI-based models in identifying carotid calcifications using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, IEEE Xplore, SciELO, and LILACS databases to identify relevant studies published up to 2025 that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence or deep learning systems in detecting carotid artery calcifications using CBCT. Grey literature sources were systematically searched. A qualitative synthesis was conducted for the included studies, followed by a diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis using sensitivity and specificity data. Analyses were performed using bivariate random-effects models (Diagnostic Random-Effects Model). Heterogeneity among studies was assessed using Cochran's Q test, the I Results: A total of 529 records were identified. No additional studies were retrieved from the grey literature. Application of inclusion and exclusion criteria resulted in the selection of four studies for qualitative synthesis. Conclusion: Despite variations in convolutional neural network (CNN) model architectures, all studies demonstrated that deep learning algorithms applied to CBCT achieve high performance levels in detecting carotid calcifications. The meta-analysis demonstrated that CNN-based models have high diagnostic potential for detecting carotid artery calcifications on CBCT. Although CBCT does not replace gold-standard diagnostic modalities, its use may represent a supportive tool for early screening and clinical referral. The expansion of datasets and the standardization of image acquisition protocols and quality are recommended.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCone-Beam Computed TomographyDeep LearningPlaque, Atherosclerotic

Identifiers

PMID42416692
PMCPMC13338740

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.