ReviewCureus2026
Diagnostic Accuracy of Liver and Spleen Elastography for Detecting Portal Hypertension Defined by Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient (HVPG) in Chronic Liver Disease: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Portal hypertension is a major consequence of chronic liver disease and a key determinant of clinical outcomes, traditionally assessed using the invasive hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG). Given the limitations of HVPG measurement, ultrasound-based elastography has emerged as a promising noninvasive alternative. This systematic review evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of liver stiffness measurement (LSM) and spleen stiffness measurement (SSM), obtained through transient elastography (TE) and shear-wave elastography (SWE), for detecting HVPG-defined portal hypertension in adults with chronic liver disease. A comprehensive search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, from database inception through December 2024, identified eight eligible studies comprising 1,636 patients. Clinically significant portal hypertension was primarily defined as an HVPG of ≥10 mmHg. Across studies, LSM demonstrated moderate-to-high discriminatory performance, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) values ranging from 0.74 to 0.94, depending on modality and population. SWE generally showed superior performance compared with conventional TE, particularly when standardized reliability criteria were applied. SSM provided complementary hemodynamic information and improved risk stratification in selected cohorts, although it did not consistently outperform LSM alone. Variability in stiffness cutoffs and study design contributed to methodological heterogeneity. Overall, ultrasound-based elastography demonstrates clinically meaningful diagnostic accuracy for identifying portal hypertension and offers a practical, noninvasive approach for risk stratification, particularly in compensated cirrhosis; however, it does not fully replace invasive HVPG measurement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.